BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 24- Embodied carbon?
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86096
Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86469
Derbyniwyd: 26/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs vivien bryer
Makes sense.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86676
Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater
No new development should be allowed which does not meet the embodied carbon requirements. Otherwise we are allowing unsustainable development, and the developer will always try to get away with whatever they can.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 86926
Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming
-
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87074
Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025
Ymatebydd: S Gardner
This could go further by asking our major academic institutions in the region - Warwick uni and Coventry uni - to have an active role in the training of planning, design, build organisations - especially those that are small - in good practice in this area.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87406
Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day
None
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 87586
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025
Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris
I do not agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88714
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown
I agree in principle but the end of life / recycling is a word widely used but in reality UK are poor at achieving efficiently and effectively with many materials that succumb to end of life.
The initial design development and build using such policies can be achieved. I question the viability of the end of life and how it is measured and not manipulated to suit.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 88798
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Erin Williams
Building 54,700 new homes will have massive implications in terms of embodied carbon. Building regulations say almost nothing about embodied carbon, so it is good to see that the intention is to go beyond building regulations for this. RIBA 2030 targets rather than 2025 must be used, and there need to be actual requirements in this local plan to reduce embodied carbon in construction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89061
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
i agree
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89267
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Jon Knight
I've recently seen the presentation of a fairly large industrial building in Leicestershire that already meetings the embodied carbon <750kgCO2e standard, so this is what new builds can already be made to. With that in mind these conditions appear adequate to enforce that minimum level of carbon use in construction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89476
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson
No further comment
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 89564
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton
RIBA 2030 targets rather than 2025 must be used, and there need to be actual requirements in this local plan to reduce embodied carbon in construction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 90420
Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Chris Tagg
Agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91180
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council
Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91674
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman
Sensible
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91770
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor
Particlaurly for dvelopments - are you going to include self-build in this requirement? If so this will put people off if you don't provide sme directive/guidance of minimum standards and how they can be met
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92467
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Julian Brown
Agree
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92593
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: The Planning Bureau Ltd
All proposals within the policy should be stepped in line with Government targets and Building Regulations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92626
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Bex Thomson
No comment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92971
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake
Let's hope this is possible
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93140
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Dr Penny Gray
Fully agree.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93188
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Checkley
I fully support Draft Policy Direction- 24
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93465
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Vivien Haggarty
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93581
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Robin Rumbles
Nothing to add
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93671
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong
Yes, but I encourage adopting the RIBA 2030 level rather than RIBA 2025. Failing immediate adoption, RIBA 2030 could be included as 'mandatory by 2030', given the plan lifetime extends well past then.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93825
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwick District Green Party
Building 54,700 new homes will have massive implications in terms of embodied carbon. Building regulations say almost nothing about embodied carbon, so it is good to see that the intention is to go beyond building regulations for this. RIBA 2030 targets rather than 2025 must be used, and there need to be actual requirements in this local plan to reduce embodied carbon in construction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94396
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Waters
N/A
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94631
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Rainier Developments Ltd
Asiant : Turley
Rainier support the approach, providing it is supported by evidence around its viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94988
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: David Gosling
Should “major development” in first sentence be more specifically defined?
It the development cannot meet the targets what are the consequences which flow? Last sentence