BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-F- Decentralised Energy Systems?
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101656
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101939
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
Could this be strengthened? Too many statements appear to offer ways of challenging the need for new builds to have decentralised energy systems.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102095
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson
I agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102155
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
63. The provision of decentralised energy systems and incorporating heating, power and cooling into new developments needs to consider the implications of the 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and whether the provision of heat networks is feasible and viable.
64. IM Land supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. However, further consideration as part of the next stage of the SWLP needs to be given to the feasibility and viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102189
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The Draft Policy advocates for the integration of decentralised energy systems in new developments, including the use of renewable energy sources. This approach aligns with the NPPF, which supports the transition to a low-carbon future by encouraging local planning policies that promote renewable and low carbon energy infrastructure.
The policy should allow for sufficient flexibility and adopt a positively worded, supportive position to encourage the use of decentralised energy systems. It is considered that introducing a requirement for each major development could potentially lead to conflicting material considerations or implications on the overall viability of the scheme.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102290
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. However, further consideration needs to be given to the feasibility and suitability of including requirements for decentralised energy systems to provide heating and cooling.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102304
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace
N/A
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102333
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough
Asiant : Marrons
It is not considered that the draft Policy, in its current state, is effective in accordance with Paragraph 36 c) of the NPPF. The current definition of ‘major’ development means that it will not be realistic to expect the majority of such applications to demonstrate the use of decentralised energy systems. The Councils will need to ensure that any Policy at Regulation 19 stage evidences the feasibility of decentralised energy systems for development and expectations in relation to the scale of development. Any approach should be viability tested.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102446
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. However, further consideration needs to be given to the feasibility and suitability of including requirements for decentralised energy systems to provide heating and cooling.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102885
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Turley
Recommend reviewing wording.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102910
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr David Bailey
I agree.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103034
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes
Asiant : Marrons
It is not considered that the draft Policy, in its current state, is effective in accordance with Paragraph 36 c) of the NPPF. The current definition of ‘major’ development means that it will not be realistic to expect the majority of such applications to demonstrate the use of decentralised energy systems. The Councils will need to ensure that any Policy at Regulation 19 stage evidences the feasibility of decentralised energy systems for development and expectations in relation to the scale of development. Any approach should be viability tested.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103365
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103367
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103369
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103370
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103372
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103373
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103375
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough generally supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. The 2025 Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) Consultation (2023) set out requirements which will significantly reduce the energy demand of new homes and buildings, this will reduce the thermal demand of new development.
It is however considered that further consideration needs to be given, specifically in relation to feasibility and suitability, to such policy requirements that go beyond current national policy and guidance.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104050
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Norrie
The explicit requirements placed on developers are particularly good, and should not be watered down.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104404
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Agree with the broad principle, however it is surprising to see gas fired heating and cooling still included (albeit as a last option) when so much funding is being dedicated to decarbonise heating. This seems to go against current government policy and NHS approach.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104416
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Appleton
Agree, but there is no place for gas fired heating or cooling, given the strategic objectives.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104677
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Ann Colley
do not agree
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104690
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: John Stott
"New developments will be expected to provide or facilitate a decentralised energy system, unless demonstrated as not viable or feasible."
The policy wording does not require "demonstrated as not viable or feasible." It only requires an order of consideration. It should require a statement why gas is the only option for heating and why the other possibilities are not viable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104751
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning
Good stuff
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104908
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Susan Ingleby
I agree.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104986
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford-on-Avon Town Council
Every new home should be mandated at planning stage to include either a heat pump or solar panels. All existing homes should be incentivised to retrofit a heat pump or solar panels. If the climate emergency is real then these requirements must be of the highest priority!
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106650
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Property and Development Group
Asiant : Framptons
Whilst it is recognised that it is relatively easy to integrate new development with renewable energy sources like solar panels, heat pumps, and battery storage from the outset, challenges still exist regarding grid connection, regulatory frameworks, and potentially complex system design depending on the chosen decentralized energy approach.
We therefore question the requirement in Draft Policy-F that all “major development” in South Warwickshire will be required to demonstrate a thermal masterplanning approach to maximise energy efficiency opportunities for the use of decentralised energy systems.
No information is provided in the draft policy, or supporting justification, as to what constitutes “major development” in this context .If “major development” represents residential developments of 10 or more dwellings, we consider the requirement to be unnecessarily burdensome for many developments. We, therefore, would like to see clarification provided in the Pre-Submission SWLP on what, in this context, is meant by “major development” i.e. a threshold in terms of unit numbers or floorspace.
The policy should also acknowledge that there might occasions where an existing system might be available but does not have enough capacity to accommodate the energy needs of planned new development. Furthermore, if the draft policy is to be taken forward into the Pre-Submission SWLP, to avoid any unnecessary ambiguity the policy should, as per the supporting justification, make clear that that detailed energy statements will be required, to include potential for connection to decentralised energy systems.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106967
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes
Asiant : Savills
Bellway supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. However, further consideration needs to be given to the feasibility and suitability of including requirements for decentralised energy systems to provide heating and cooling.
Development coming forward after the introduction of the FHS and FBS will only be able to connect to heat networks where the energy demand of the new buildings is matched by equivalent low carbon heat, i.e. delivered through the use of a heat pump.
Further to the technical constraints noted above the Council’s evidence base supporting this particular policy does not adequately consider the implications of the FHS and FBS on the likely heating requirements and heat density of new development. Nor does it consider the cost and viability of this type of system at this stage.
In this context it is considered unlikely that the reduced energy demand of new development is unlikely to provide sufficient heat demand for a low carbon heat network to be feasible or viable for low destiny development. It is recommended the Council give further consideration to the technical feasibility of heat networks and costs as part of the next stage of Plan preparation to ensure any proposals are feasible and viable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107076
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Cotswolds National Landscape Board
Yes, the Cotswolds National Landscape (CNL) Board agrees with the approach laid out in Draft Policy F.
This approach aligns with the approach that is advocated in Policy CC1 (Climate Change - Mitigation) of the CNL Management Plan41 and in the Board’s Climate Change Strategy42.
We agree with the statement, in the Preferred Options consultation, that the Government’s Written Ministerial Statement does not inhibit local authorities in setting targets higher than the national targets if they are justified by robust evidence in terms of deliverability and do not have negative financial constraints on developments.